Inventory management is complex and high-stakes. Small decisions can cost an electronic manufacturer a lot of money and negatively impact the environment in the process.
Recent supply chain disruptions caused by severe weather events, global conflict, and shifting market dynamics make choosing the right inventory management strategy more important than ever.
Just-in-Time (JIT) and Just-in-Case (JIC) are two widely adopted inventory management strategies in electronics manufacturing. This article explores their implications and how Component Sense helps mitigate risks associated with both by helping companies redistribute surplus electronic components.
As the name suggests, JIT is when component stock is acquired only just as it is actually needed for production. The inventory management and procurement strategy was initially created by Toyota sometime between 1948 and 1975.
Many companies, including those in PCB assembly, have adopted JIT since Toyota pioneered the strategy. JIT is particularly beneficial in industries with rapidly evolving technology, production involving modular designs, lean operating environments, and if manufacturers have a secure and reliable supply chain.
Although some manufacturers view JIT as risky, its financial benefits often outweigh the perceived risks.
Pros of JIT:
Cons of JIT:
Top tip: Many brand-new, unused, discontinued components are in stock with trusted secondary market sellers like Component Sense!
One of the core benefits of JIT is its potential to minimise waste.
Pros of JIT:
Cons of JIT:
Unlike JIT, JIC is often considered a safer approach, as it involves holding more stock than immediately needed for production. In essence, over-forecasting.
JIC procurement and inventory management have become especially popular following major supply chain disruptions, such as the global chip shortages during the COVID-19 pandemic. It is understandable why electronic manufacturers would want to take an approach that protects their production line.
This strategy is particularly beneficial for industries with long lead times for components or where sourcing unique parts is critical. Medical, aerospace, and defence manufacturing generally fall into this category.
Although JIC is often seen as more reliable for maintaining production, it comes with significant costs.
Pros of JIC:
Cons of JIC:
While JIC inventory management may be justified for financial reasons, some see it as a less environmentally friendly option.
Pros of JIC:
Cons of JIC:
Ultimately, the best inventory strategy depends on your industry, supply chain stability, and ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) goals. Sustainability is becoming more of a priority for electronic manufacturers worldwide, and rightly so. Many companies are assessing their practices and, in particular, the option of JIT to reduce waste.
In some cases, companies operate a hybrid strategy - JIT for most general components and JIC for highly critical, unique, and irreplaceable parts. While JIT has the potential to reduce costs and e-waste, some see it as riskier. JIC may be seen as a safer approach, but it can create more (E&O) inventory.
The good news is that Component Sense mitigates the risks of both JIT and JIC inventory management. Our InPlantâ„¢ redistribution solution simplifies surplus stock management by identifying and redistributing excess at the earliest possible stage. Component Sense also helps buyers of electronic components by providing access to unused parts no longer available through direct channels.